Income arrives. It leaves unlogged.
You make good money but you don't know where it goes. Rent, food, crypto experiments, the occasional Amazon binge. At the end of the year you've spent it all and have nothing to show for it.
A 14-day proof-of-concept for engineers and PMs who out-earn their net worth. Ship the spend audit, surface the surplus hiding in plain sight, and fire your first automated transfer before willpower gets a vote.
You make $150K+/year but you're not investing any of it. Your net worth hasn't moved in 5 years. We show you why and how to fix it.
This document specifies a system for converting a high salary into actual net worth — the gap most well-paid engineers never close. The 14-day protocol exists to close it.
Scope is deliberately small: instrument the system, prove the surplus is real, land the first commits. No lifestyle migration, no budgeting religion — a working prototype of a wealth engine you can keep running.
Three failure modes filed against the current system. If your repro steps match, this protocol was written for you — not for someone with a trust fund and a finance degree.
You make good money but you don't know where it goes. Rent, food, crypto experiments, the occasional Amazon binge. At the end of the year you've spent it all and have nothing to show for it.
You know you *should* invest but index funds feel boring and crypto feels risky. You don't have the time to learn and you feel stupid for not knowing this already.
You see founders and senior engineers with real wealth and you wonder 'how did they do that?' while you're paycheck-to-paycheck on a $200K salary. The math doesn't add up and that's the problem.
No strategy, no philosophy — an architecture. Income flows in, the system instruments it, automates the surplus into the market, and a weekly retro tunes the one parameter that matters. You become the operator, not the bottleneck.
paycheck → checking
We audit your spending for the last 6 months. Most tech professionals have $2,000–5,000/month that could be invested but isn't. They just don't see it. Once you see it, it's hard to unsee.
in: 6-mo spend · out: investable surplus
Not a strategy, not a philosophy. A system: paycheck comes in, X amount goes to savings on day 1. Your brain doesn't get to decide. The money is invested before you notice it's gone.
in: surplus · out: transfer, fired on day 1
diversified index funds → net worth ↑
Friday morning: review last week's spending. Any surprises? Any patterns? Adjust next week. Like a sprint retro for your money.
reads: last week's spend · tunes: transfer amount
Defaults shown. Every parameter is calibrated to your numbers in the 2-minute intake — nothing here is one-size-fits-all.
Short and honest. Before the balance compounds much, the architecture is already standing: instrumented, automated, and running without you.
First commit: the spend audit ships. Six months of transactions, finally instrumented — and the surplus you swore was not there shows up in the diff.
commit 7c1a · signed-off · first commits
The first automated transfer fires before you can talk yourself out of it. Small, boring, repeatable. The engine is live.
commit 3f9e · signed-off · first commits
Three operators, three different cycles, one protocol. Names rotated for privacy; roles and deltas are real. Cohort median, not best case — withdrawals included.
“I never needed motivation. I needed a transfer that tolerates a sev2 at 11 PM and a re-org in the same month. This is the first money system that did not fall apart in week two.”
“The surplus was always there. I just had never instrumented it. Once the audit shipped, I could not un-see the $3k a month I was leaking into nothing.”
“Calibrate, automate, retro. I run my org on that loop — turns out it runs my money too. The Friday review is the only ritual that survived a whole year.”
The objections every engineer raises in review. All pre-cached — we have heard each one before.
For this protocol: boring index funds. 85% of your portfolio. If you want to experiment with crypto/stocks, use 15% of the surplus. But the engine is boring diversification.
Depends on interest rate. <4% interest: invest while paying minimum. >6% interest: accelerate payoff. We calculate the math, not the emotions.
Depends on the strike price vs. current valuation. We run the numbers. But most engineers should. This is how founders build wealth.
No. Day 1 of investing beats day 1000 of thinking about it. The best time to start is now. The second best time was yesterday.
A 14-day kickstart — instrument the money, surface the surplus, and prove the engine runs. The intake takes two minutes, reads your real numbers, and returns a 14-day protocol calibrated to your cash flow — no card, no upsell mid-quiz, no shame copy.
$ git merge --no-ff wealth-protocol
Updating checking → diversified
Fast-forward
net_worth | compounding +
willpower | 0 required
status | release candidateno card · 2 min · no shame copy